94
explanation, he would decline to go to Geneva in April as the
French representative.
3. M. Bourgois' attention was then drawn to the state-
ment in the "Seoulo" of December 6th last regarding an agree-
ment said to have been drawn up in Paris providing for the
supply of opium from Indo-China to Macao. M. Bourgois stated
that Dr. Augusto de Vasconcellos during his visit to Paris had
suggested that some such agreement should be drawn up between
the French and Portuguese authorities. The Ministry for
Foreign Affairs had definitely refused to allow any such agree-
ment to be made. Dr. de Vasconcellos had been told politely
but firmly that if the Portuguese wished to import opium into
Macao they must get it for themselves and must not endeavour
to enlist French support for this purpose. M. Bourgois added
that he was sure that Dr. de Vasconcellos knew enough of the
Far East to be able to get as much opium for Macao as he wanted
without any outside assistance.
4. M. Bourgois requested that the information contained
in the foregoing paragraph should be treated as confidential,
as he did not wish Dr. de Vasconcellos to know exactly how it
was that his suggestions had met with no success.
5. It was explained to M. Bourgois that in view of the
discussions which were to take place at Geneva in April, His
Majesty's Government were anxious before that time to reach
some agreement with the French Government regarding the
questions of the illicit drug traffic from Kwang-Chow-Wan to
Hongkong, and of the leakage from Indo-China of Indian opium
supplied to the Indo-Chinese Government for use in Indo-China.
M. Bourgois agreed that some such agreement was desirable and
promised to urge the Ministry for Colonies to accelerate the
observations/
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.